tattoos
Showing posts with label Comparisons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comparisons. Show all posts

Thursday, September 2, 2010

350th post: Presenting 4 COUPES GROUP TEST! by...

350th post: 4 COUPES GROUP TEST! by...
WHATCAR? UK, as featured in February 1997 Issue.

BMW 328i E46 Coupe vs Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo vs Honda Prelude 2.2 VTI-S (BB8)  vs Nissan Silvia S14


HONDAFUL!


Honda's new Prelude has more power and ability - but so has the quickest Fiat ever built. Is it all over for BMW and Nissan?


Everyone who says that all cars are the same these days hasn't been watching what's been happening to coupes recently.

The new Honda Prelude (here on Valentine's Day, 1997) and Fiat Coupe (on sale since November 1996) are proof enough. Throw in the strong-selling BMW 328i and Nissan 200 SX and the argument gets stronger. Two cars with turbos; two without. Two front-driven; two rear-drive.

The latest Prelude is longer and taller to increase cabin room, and less eccentric in its dash design. Some say it's duller for it. But with the demo pack of side skirts, rear spoiler and larger wheels/tyres fitted to our test car (£2995), we wouldn't agree. And there's always its magnificent 2.2-litre VTEC engine to keep you entertained. There's another novelty in its semi­automatic Sequential Sports Shift gearbox, too.

The biggest change on the Fiat is the adoption of 20-valve five-cylinder engines in place of 16-valve fours. As before, there are standard and turbo versions: the latter, as tested here.fs Fiat's fastest production car yet.

The Nissan, the beneficiary of minor styling and interior tweaks, also goes down the turbo route, while the BMW 328i relies on a large-capacity, multi­cylinder engine. It is expensive, though, and if you lease (and most do with cars like these) the Fiat will cost less per month.

From this melee of styles and layouts we have to produce a winner which best exemplifies what coupe motoring is all about. Picking the best from this store of talent is no easy task.


CONTENDERS AT A GLANCE






Honda Prelude 2.2 VTi.

More space, fewer eccentricities in new Prelude.


BMW 328i E36 coupe

"BMW 328i is silky. easy-going. but snarls as revs increase·"


PERFORMANCE

BMW ••••

Fiat •••••

Honda •••

Nissan ••••

The Honda has the least power (185hp) and most weight (1346kg); lacks the turbocharger-fed boost of the Fiat and Nissan or the cubic-capacity and milti-cylinders of the BMW; and also has the sapping effects of the £1200 Sequential Sports shift transmission. So it's hardly surprising to find it the slowest of the group. Still, there are some who'll trade ultimate performance for a smooth, fully automatic gearbox . to help them through city snarl-ups with the option of dictating the changes manually elsewhere. You slip the lever into Drive, slide it to the right into a secondary groove and nudge it forwards to go up the 'box or backwards to come down.


It gives you total command, too. Forget to change gp and it will hold the gear until the rev limiter cuts in at 8000rprn, accompanied by that rising wall of music which distinguishes Honda's 2.2-litre VTEC engine, There's no better four -cvlinder engine in the world. Change down too soon, when the revs aren't right and its as jerky as a clumsily driven manual. It only takes over the downshifts if you forget, and then merely to prevent stalling. There are frustrations in having only four gears rather than the five offered by the manual gearbox, though.


The ratios are too widely spaced (1st is good for 41mph, 2nd for 73 and 3rd for 110) and with an engine as high revving as the VTEC, whose modest 153lb ft of torque peaks at 5300rpm, this is something you notice. Let the revs dip below 3500rpm and it feels flat. It then becomes brisk rather than fast until 5000rpm, the point at which the VTEC magic comes into play to alter the valve gear operation and put the engine's full might at your disposal.


All this talk of gear spacing and rev bands will be totally alien to the Fiat driver. The change from this car's former 16valve four-cylinder engine to a 20-valve five, still of 2.0 litres, has largely eradicated such matters frorn the Coupe turbo's agenda. There's still a smidgen of throttle lag, the delay between squeezing the accelerator and getting a response, if you let the revs fall too low, but it's been massively shortened. You'll notice it in vastly improved driveability. With the old car, everything happened too drastically for peace of mind. In the New one, despite hefty increases in output to 220bhp and 228lb ft, it's much easier to regulate your progress. Torque peaks at a lowly 2500rpm and turbo boost is on tap from 2000.


A shortish straight on a narrow road offers overtaking opportunities drivers of the other cars might have to think twice about; from 30-60mph in third it's 1.2 secs quicker than the next best BMW, while in forth the gap widens to 1.9 secs. It's advantage for lane changes on the motorway is no less impressive. It's smoother too, thanks to a balancer shaft, though the Fiat's engine doesn't match the silkiness of the Honda's or BMW's. But the increase from four to five cylinders removes the lovely rortiness of the old car's exhaust note: there's now a deep rumble reminiscent of the original Audi Quattro.




Above: Excellent dash same as in 3-series saloon. radio dealer-fit option so costs extra. Seats hard but comfortable. height-adjustable



Above: BMW has biggest boot (14.2cuft) and best rear cabin space. Leather seats cost £1245 extra


FIAT COUPE 20v turbo
"The Fiat Coupe has boldest styling and its detailing is delightful!"

Above: Wonderful cabin feels so good to sit in, if short of stowage space; seat height fixed, but wheel adjusts for rake and reach to compensate
Above: Coupe's boot a reasonable 10.2 cu It and is useful shape; poor legroom in rear, though headroom is acceptable

NISSAN 200SX (SILVIA S14)

"The Nissan 200 SX's rear-wheel drive is an enthusiast's delight"



Expect similar performance from the Nissan, which is also turbo boosted, and you'll be disappointed. Its outputs (197bhp and 1951b ft) are achieved at higher revs than in all but the Honda; the gap between second and third gear ratios is wider than in the Fiat; the engine needs more stoking before its turbo boost becomes apparent; and despite some form of variable valve control, its torque isn't as accessible.


You're forced to use the gears more often to keep the revs above 2750, where everything seems to come together. That's no problem:

Nissan's shift is fastest of the four (no Fiat or Honda tranverse engine/gearbox installation to corrupt the linkage here).


There's nothing demanding about driving the 200 SX, but there isn't the same well of boost to call upon as there is in the Fiat. Result: it's left flailing in the Italian's slipstream everywhere. Rev it hard and it's. more gruff and throaty; too.

What's impressive is the way the BMW also outpaces the 200 SX in everyday motoring proving there's no substitute for cubic centimetres and cylinders when you're seeking greatest flexibility. The 2.8-litre six­-cylinder engine is as silky as the Honda unit, as easy-going as they come in the way it deploys its 193bhp and 206lb ft, and has a lovely snarl as its revs increase.


It spins so freely that in the lower three gears you're at the rev limiter before you know it, but there's no need to drive it that hard. Light weight, low internal friction and yet another form of variable valve control (to improve torque at slower engine speeds) give the 328i the cleanest low­speed pick-up of the quartet.

Honda Prelude 2.2 VTEC £23,495


'There's no better four cylinder engine than the Prelude's VTEC'

Above: Prelude boot is shallow 10.0cu ft but lid opens wide; rear has enough space for adults on a short journey.



Above: Dash dreary. but self-concealing radio is neat standard sunroof makes headroom tight for the tall; wheel adjusts for rake.



HANDLING AND RIDE

BMW ••••

Fiat •••

Honda ••••

Nissan •••


WHAT a disparate bunch. A mixture of front- and rear-wheel drive assisted (or otherwise) by various forms of traction control. The BMW came to us in £3130 more expensive Sport guise with revised suspension and bigger wheels and tyres, while even the Honda had striking 17in alloys with 215/40 tyres instead of the standard 205/50 16 set-up.


These days most coupes are driven by the front wheels, so it's an enthusiast's delight to find the BMW and Nissan adhering to old-school principles. Least corrupted of the lot is the Japanese car, which sends its power and torque to the rear end with only a limited slip differential to aid the cause.


And yes, you can find yourself in Hollywood car-chase-style slides. A tightish bend, low gear and early stab of power and you're travelling sideways, especially if the surface is damp. It all happens in such slow motion, though, that total control is hard to lose and easy to regain.

The steering is direct, firmly weighted and reasonably informative. It must be said too, that such behaviour only resul from provocation or excessive clumsiness. There's nothing scary about the 200 SX if it's driven with common sense.

There was a time when BMW ­could be even more wayward, but try similar antics in the 328i and the Automatic Stability and Traction device intervenes, either ­by braking a spinning wheel or getting the management system to pull the plug on the engine for a second.


Switch it off and you still need to be brutal to get the car out of shape when riding on the Sport version's expansive tyres (225/45R17 front, 245/40R17 rear) such is the way it settles on its haunches and cling to the road. It makes the 328i reassuring through fast sweepers and S-bends, though the tyres are prone to being diverted by surface changes. The handling's weak link is the limp steering at the start of a turn.


The Fiat wheel feels light too, and with only 2.2 turns between full left and full right rudder it evokes super-sharp responses, so a period of familiarisation is best advised. There's no nervousness about the 20v turbo's behaviour, just a tendency to follow the contours of bumpy B-roads a little too closely.

The engine management system will, where necessary limit turbo boost in first and second gears to tame wheelspin, while a traction control mechanism prevents you flying off the outside of an injudiciously approached corner. All that's needed is a bit more feel and, at times, composure.

All VTEC-engined Preludes will come to the UK with four-­wheel steering, though our early production car didn't have it. No matter - even without the rear wheels lending a hand or any form of traction device, there's masses of grip. The Honda is softer than its three rivals, but capable of covering all manner of ground with immense stability and serenity - it's more grand tourer than sports car. It has beautiful steering which increases in weight and self­centring effect as cornering forces increase, but even at low speed it's firm and positive.



Despite its shallow tyres, it serves up the most supple, sooth­ing ride, too, though with a fair smattering of road noise. The BMW, underpinned by stiffer sports suspension, is too firm to swallow sharp ridges, though it's never harsh, and neither the Fiat nor the Nissan tread lightly enough over low-speed town obstacles. Considering they all are put performance uppermost, there's not much to complain about, though.



Above: Boot is smallest here at 8.5cu ft and seats too cramped for adults; all-black cabin trim feels gloomy

Above: Armrests and centre storage bin make driving seat feel confined; wheel adjusts for rake. but seat has no height-adjustment


All four have disc brakes all round, ventilated at the front, with anti-lock back-up. Our only complaint concerns the sogginess and lack of initial response in the Fiat.



DRIVER APPEAL

BMW •••

Fiat ••••

Honda •••

Nissan ••


This is what gets you into the showroom in the first place and keeps you happy long after you've driven away. It's almost inevitable that the Fiat should win here, but it earns this accolade not just for the boldness of its styling or the delightful details which finish it off.



The Fiat is the shortest and narrowest of the four, yet it doesn't feel it. You get two-way steering adjustment (tilt only in the others), so even though its big, snug seat is set at a fixed height, you've every chance of finding an ideal, roomy driving position, and you're unencumbered by the console boxes which restrict elbow room in the two Japanese cars. That does, however, leave you short of oddments space. It has lovely switches and dials, too, all topped off with that swathe of body-colour plastic running across the dash. If only it had the no-quibble quality feel of the Honda.


Unforthnately, the Prelude's excellence in workmanship and materials is not echoed by it's interior design. You can dress up the exterior like our car's but not the cabin, which looks like that of an upmarket Accord saloon.


The Honda is short of front headroom (it's the only one with a standard sunroof), and the steering wheel ought to telescope to allow both the short and the tall to find a less compromised driving position. It does, however, have the most rearward seat travel. The unimaginativeness of your surroundings is lifted by a tray between the front seats which converts into a couple of cup­holders, and an optional hi-fi which disappears behind a flap when switched off to look as though the unit's front panel has been removed.

Sitting in the BMW; you don't much feel like you're in a coupe, any more than you do in the Honda. The impressive driving position, facia layout, switchgear and interior features are just as they would be if you'd bought a 3-series saloon. The seat is solid and Germanic but surprisingly comfortable over distances and there's somewhere for everything, but nothing distinctive about the place. The same criticism is often used about the exterior design, though that hasn't stopped the BMW regularly featuring as the UK's top-selling coupe.



The Nissan has recently been revised to try to capture some of the aggressiveness that's missing from the BMW. It gets a redesigned front end, which looks rather fussy and

layered, and a minor interior upgrade. It's hardly a welcoming place, though. The cabin is black and gloomy, and it feels cramped unless you enjoy being hemmed in by centre console, armrests and steering wheel.



All four of these cars have what might be termed essentials in a £20,000-plus coupe except the BMW, which is delivered without a hi-fi system. Honda runs to standard air-conditioning. All have driver airbags and engine immobilisers, but only the Fiat and Honda have passenger airbags, too.



SPACE & PRACTICALITY

BMW ••••

Fiat •••

Honda •••

Nissan ••


If you wanted room for 4 adults in something a little out of ordinary you'd buy a sports saloon. Still it's good to be able to fit a couple of children in occasionally, while a boot big enough for a couple of sets of golf clubs (or similar) is necessity. That was the rationale behind Honda's decision to make this Prelude longer and taller than the last, at the risk of losing it's purity of shape.



It's not the most spacious though. The honour goes to the BMW, often critised for rear-seat space as a saloon but comfortably off when measured alongside rival's 2-door cars. It had a lot more rear legroom than the Fiat and Honda, both which are just acceptable (the Japanese car imposes a knee-up sitting position), while the Nissan's rear accomodation is Hopeless for adults.



All except the BMW have tilt/slide front passenger seats to ea e access to the rear, though those in the Nissan and Honda won't return to their previous position afterwards. Headroom in the back of all four is a problem, too, though you can live with its shortfall for a while in all but the Nissan.


The biggest boot is the BMW's; the Fiat's has the best shape; the Nissan's is poor despite the switch to the space­saver wheel and tyre used in all four to increase luggage capacity. Each has fold-down rear seats, split in all but the Honda, with through-load hatches for long loads. All are reasonably practical when the need arises.


Fiat's attraction lies in its detailing: badging, racing­style fuel filler, even key and fob make you want to own one


Nudge to right, then forwards for up the 'box, backwards for down - Prelude's semi-auto gears. Has cruise control and 'self­hiding' radio



VERDICT:

Once you've decided to go for a coupe, your concerns are different from those of saloon or hatchback buyers. Costs and practicality matter less for once than image and enjoyment.

There's raw, crude entertainment to be had from flinging the Nissan around; sophisticated pleasures to be found in the flexible BMW; GT comforts in the beautifully crafted Honda; and giggle-inducing excitement from the Fiat.

For all the wonderful qualities of the BMW engine, the car doesn't feel enough like a coupe. You might as well buy a 3-series saloon. You'd gain a bit of versatility and lose nothing.

So it's the Honda and Fiat that tempt us more. The Prelude lacks interior charm. You'll enjoy comfort, refinement, faultless quality and an engine that sounds so good it should be recorded on CD. We can understand if you choose it.

But we'd take the Fiat. There are few cars with the capacity to thrill like this one - and for such a reasonable price. If Fiat had asked £25,000 we might have raised our eyebrows - but only a little. Instead, you're getting 150mph performance for a lot less. Climb in, buckle up and hang on for an experience you won't believe .

SPECIFICATIONS: Double click to enlarge...




END OF A WONDERFULLY WRITTEN 4 CARS SHOOT OUT. One of my favourite Article.



Source: Whatcar? UK,. February 1997 issue (page 50 to 59). A WHOOPING 9 pages total. Painstakingly scanned and typed by Jeff Lim (yours truly).

Monday, June 14, 2010

ARTICLE: Alloy vs Steel rims...

by Kyle Waller
Cars + Trucks
Alloy vs. Steel Wheel Rims

The Right Rims  

Drivers must always keep the upkeep of their tires and rims in mind.  Demands for great quality rims as well as a market trend for appealing alloy and chrome rims are constantly changing.  While the battle between alloy and steel rims goes on, here is a brief description of both that will give you a better idea of what drivers use where the car meets the road.


Alloy  

Nothing looks better on a new car than a set of alloy wheels.  The shiny finish and unnoticed tires give a sleek and polished look to any car.  Unfortunately, nothing is more vulnerable to theft, abuse and wear and tear from the road than a set of alloy wheels and thin tires.  According to the LA Times Auto, a pounding from a pothole can bend a rim or chink off a few inches of the rim lip.  Other problems arise when parking too close to the curb.  Driving up on a curb will easily scratch these thousand dollar rims.  A driver can replace the damaged wheel with an identical design, pick up one that doesn’t match, buy an entire new set of wheels or repair the damaged wheel.



Buying a rim that doesn’t match the others is tacky and should never be done unless you’re going for the two-and two look in which case you still have to match at least one other rim.  There are, however, some repair companies that specialize in restoring any damaged alloy wheel back to excellent quality.



Transwheel Corp, which describes itself as the largest alloy repair vendor in the United States, handles more than 150,000 wheel repairs annually, according to its website.  The cost ranges from $130 to $300 per wheel depending on various qualities such as type, size and year.  Under company guidelines, they will remove up to 20 thousandths of an inch of material in a resurfacing repair.



Steel rims

Although alloy rims have become the craze, steel wheels are still dependable when it comes to vehicle maintenance.  During the year, wheels are subject to much damage and abuse by road conditions and weather.  Steel wheels do much better in the winter season than alloy rims.  They also meet the basic needs of drivers who want the convenience of a winter tire package without the additional cost of an alloy wheel, according to TireRack.com.  

Also, while many must paint their alloy rims after purchase, steel wheels are not the most fashionable and are therefore available in black or silver finish and basic styling can be updated with wheel covers.  On the negative side, steel is not a good conductor of heat, so the heat is usually focused on the brakes, which means the brake system will have to be maintained much more frequently.



While alloy wheels are fragile and inconvenient when damaged, steel wheels cost less due to high manufacturing and low material costs.  Although steel wheels can be heavier than alloy wheels, most of these wheels are actually smaller than their alloy counterparts.



The Faceoff  

Alloy rims are simply a complement to the appearance of a vehicle while steel rims are meant for durability.  Cheap alloy rims are not corrosion resistant and can be easily damaged by crushed stones, road conditions and road salt during the winter months.  This is why manufacturers and suppliers have recently begun offering special winter rims that are highly impact and scratch resistant.  Steel wheels can weigh down the car, depending on the style and can cause brake damage due to the heat buildup.



So if you’re looking for what’s trendy and in style, alloy rims may be the choice for you provided you keep them clean and safe.  If you just want your car to be free to move, steel is the best choice, but you’ll have a less attractive car and some not-so-shiny wheels.


END OF SOURCE:
http://www.driversense.com/driversense/story_ss/314#

THAT'S ALL FOLKS...  Thanks for having the time and patience to read this blog entry.














Tuesday, January 12, 2010

CBT COMPARO: Myvi vs Saga BLM vs Hyundai i10

In this blog entry, I'm going to write about NEW CARS.   This is because I have AT LEAST 5 fresh graduate friends' looking to buy his/her 1st NEW CAR (NOT USED) with RM50,000 below budget.  Well despite me doing some persuasions and suggestions that a used car HAS BETTER CHOICES and LESS DEPRECIATION, they still "DEGIL".  They, still want NEW CAR.

As I'm NOT A RENOWNED NEW CAR JOURNALIST, it's IMPOSSIBLE for me to obtain ONE test car, let alone THREE.  All is NOT LOST.  I dished out "3 CARS SHOOTOUT BETWEEN.  Perodua MYVI, Proton SAGA BLM, and INOKOM (Hyundai) I10" courtesy of New Sunday Times, Cars.Bikes.Trucks website.   Yup, gotta leave the testing to the "EXPERTS"!.  Here's the Article.  Enjoy!

Battle for entry level supremacy

A Cars.Bikes.Trucks Article

Both the Perodua Myvi and new Proton Saga dominate the entry level car segment in the country, while the Inokom i10 has sold reasonably well since it was launched here last year.
It is easy to see why these three cars are popular buys, with affordable pricing, spacious cabins and a host of attractive features.
The Myvi is still the best-selling car in the country after four years although the new Saga is not far behind in sales performance.
Japanese technological input is one reason for the popularity of the Myvi, which is the result of a Perodua, Daihatsu and Toyota collaboration.
Meanwhile, the new Saga is an odd one out here as it is a four-door sedan while both the Myvi and i10 are five-door hatchbacks.

Still, the new Saga has capitalised on the fact that Malaysians like four-door sedans with large boots.
The i10, which is the replacement model for the Hyundai Atos Prime in Europe, is also an odd one out here as it is categorised as a non-national car.
In Malaysia, the i10 is assembled at the Inokom plant in Kulim, Kedah.
The Hyundai Motor India plant in Chennai manufactures the i10 for the European market where it scored four stars out of a possible five in Euro NCAP (New Car Assessment Programme) safety tests.

All three are award-winning cars (the i10 bagged the Indian Car of the Year 2008).  
These three cars also see strong demand among those looking for additional vehicles in their households.
Although there are a number of lower-priced Myvi and new Saga variants, we chose the high-specifications models as these would compete closely with the i10.

EXTERIOR
In terms of size, the new Saga has the biggest footprint while the i10 is the smallest car with the shortest wheelbase.
Height-wise, the new Saga is also the lowest at 1,502mm.
Both the new Saga and Myvi have electric side mirrors while the i10 only has manually adjustable side mirrors.
Here, only the Myvi has turn indicators integrated into the side mirror housings.
In the styling arena, the Myvi still retains a modern hatchback look with large eye-catching headlamps after four years.
The new Saga features a functional boxy look while the i10 carries bright, curvy and cute styling cues that are aimed at attracting a high percentage of female buyers. 

INTERIOR
The new Saga offers the largest cabin space in its class, and one of its advantages is a sizeable 413-litre boot.
Also, the new Saga has the longest wheelbase at 2,465mm, and this translates into plenty of legroom.

Headroom is more than adequate for our 1.7m bodies, and Proton must be commended for an interior design that maximises the amount of passenger elbow room in a compact sedan.

Although the i10 has the shortest wheelbase at 2,380mm, we have mentioned in previous car reviews that legroom and headroom were ample for our 1.7m bodies.

In fact, we found quite decent levels of comfort in the spacious cabin of the i10 despite its compact exterior dimensions.   
In the i10, we were especially taken with the large-sized fabric seats and passenger headrests which provided high comfort levels on long distance journeys.

The Myvi has the most nifty-looking instrument control layout here, especially with its blue-coloured optitron meter combination, while both the new Saga and i10 have simple and functional dashboard designs.

All three cars have four-speaker radio CD audio set-ups, but the new Saga is the only one with a non-MP3 capable system.

Here, the audio system in the Myvi stands out as it also features USB and Bluetooth connectivity.

DRIVING IMPRESSION
Recent generations of Proton cars have developed a reputation for their exceptional handling dynamics, cornering agility and steering accuracy, and the new Saga is no different.
All three cars here have similar suspension set-ups, with front MacPherson strut and torsion beam rear.

The Saga is the heaviest car here with a 1,065kg kerb weight, compared with the Myvi 1.3 EZi (kerb weight of 955kg) and i10 (gross vehicle weight of 920kg).
Still, it should be noted that the new Saga has the most powerful engine here.
We found all three cars to have brisk acceleration although the Myvi stood out when it came to smooth and serene driving as well as fluid gear shifts.

All three cars, with front disc brakes and rear drums, provided competent stopping power.
Both the new Saga and Myvi 1.3 EZi have 40-litre fuel tanks while the i10 features a 35-litre fuel tank.

All three cars, shod with 14-inch wheels, provided more than acceptable levels of passenger comfort as well as ease of manoeuvring and parking in tight spaces.
In the area of NVH (noise, vibration and harshness), it was a tough call for us but we found ourselves to be most comfortable with the i10. 

CONCLUSION
When it comes to handling and agility, and cargo storage space as well as competitive pricing, the new Saga is the winner.

In the areas of proven long-term reliability, high resale value, and low maintenance costs, the winner is the very well-equipped Myvi.

Still, we really liked the i10 mainly due to its large-sized seats and headrests which felt solid - we found them to be really comfortable during our daily commuting from Klang to Kuala Lumpur.

Many would disagree with us, but we think that the i10 just squeezes ahead of its rivals here in terms of overall packaging - passenger comfort, safety, practicality, design aesthetics, driving smoothness, pricing and driver satisfaction.




By Thomas Huong

Specifications
Inokom i10    
Engine: 1,086cc SOHC petrol
Max power: 66hp @ 5,500rpm
Max torque: 99Nm @ 2,800rpm
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Features: Dual airbags, ABS
Price: RM48,888 OTR with insurance

Proton Saga 1.3 M-Line (automatic)
Engine: 1,332cc Campro 16V DOHC with IAFM (integrated air fuel module)
Max power: 94hp @ 6,000rpm
Max torque: 120Nm @ 4,000rpm
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Features: Driver's airbag
Price: RM41,498 OTR with insurance

Perodua Myvi 1.3 EZi
Engine: 1,298cc in-line 4-cylinder DOHC with DVVT (dynamic variable valve timing)
Max power: 86hp @ 6,000rpm
Max torque: 116Nm @ 3,200rpm
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Features: Dual airbags, ABS with EBD (electronic brake force distribution) and BA (brake assist)
Price: RM49,700 OTR with insurance


Servicing costs
Proton Saga (automatic)
Service intervals       Costs
1,000km                 RM118
5,000km                 RM118
10,000km               RM234
20,000km               RM585
30,000km               RM330
40,000km               RM610
50,000km               RM330
60,000km               RM585
Total                       RM2,910

Inokom i10
Service intervals       Costs
1,000km               RM151
5,000km               RM151
10,000km             RM167
15,000km             RM167
20,000km             RM328
25,000km             RM165
30,000km             RM165
35,000km             RM165
40,000km             RM1,340
45,000km             RM165
50,000km             RM165
55,000km             RM165
60,000km             RM328
Total                     RM3,622
Hyundai-Sime Darby Motors Sdn Bhd says the charges quoted are indicative figures, and discounts are usually available at authorised service centres.

Perodua Myvi
According to Perodua, the total cost of maintaining the Myvi over the first 60,000km is RM1,686.25.
This includes charges of RM127.25 for a normal service package as well as approximately RM350 for every 20,000km service interval.

SOURCES:
 1) NEW SUNDAY TIMES, Cars.Bikes.Trucks pullout article published on 23 August 2009 http://cbt.com.my/090825/battle-entry-level-supremacy

That's all folks, thanks for having the time and patience to read this LONG but WONDERFULLY WRITTEN article.


Friday, December 25, 2009

VIDEO: New Ford Escape vs. New Honda CRV

Video review: New Ford Escape 2.3 vs New Honda CRV.

I found this SUPER DETAILED and COMPREHENSIVE comparisons between Ford Escape and Honda CRV. However, this YOUTUBE VIDEO is in Bahasa Indonesia. For those who understand it, is SUPER INFORMATIVE review... I Rated this review 90%.

Apparently, Honda Indonesia's distributor chosen to sell the CRV in 170ps 2.4IVTEC instead of 156ps 2.0IVTEC found in Malaysia. BUT our CRV is LOADED with reverse sensor, better ICE (In-car entertainment) with 2 extra speakers, steering wheel control on essential Head-unit buttons, Cruise control, roof rail and other goodies not found in Indonesian CRV. So WE MALAYSIAN gain some (specs, gadgets) and lose some (engine) from the CRV.

Meanwhile, ENJOY the Video:



Video review:

SOURCE:
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWkiDiXq7eg

That's all folks, thanks for viewing...

Monday, March 2, 2009

Sheep (Civic) takes on Wolf (Lynx RS)..

In this blog entry, I dug out a Comparison test from my collection of Malaysian car magazines. It's a "WELL WRITTEN" Shoot-out between a Sheep and a Wolf. This is sourced from CARS.MY, Issue 24, 2004. It's written by Faisal Shah and Photography by Uncle Mel Lee. Though it's NOT WRITTEN by me, but I painstakingly SCANNED and typed it out for you guys/girls reading pleasure.

Sheep: Honda Civic 2.0iVTEC and
Wolf: Ford Lynx RS (A)

Let the SHOOTOUT BEGINS. ENJOY THE SURPRISE VERDICT:

Try double-clicking the picture to read page 1 of the article:



A dogfight?


Unfortunately, we come to the bit there this review ceases to be a competitive exercise and turns into a rout, and one in the losing end is the newer and more expensive car. Dynamically, the Civic 2.0i-VTEC is so far off the pace of the Lynx RS that it isn’t even in the same country, let alone the same class, and I’m not talking about chassis dynamics only.

In standing start, the Honda gradually loses ground to the Ford, despite having a healthy power advantage. The gap is maintained all the way until about 170kph, which is when the Ford shifts up into its overdrive 4th gear and ceases to accelerate meaningfully anymore. It’s here that the Civic finally makes its extra power and gear ratio tell as it easily tops 200kph. But you have to wonder how often most drivers will go that quickly.

Head for the hills and the Lynx RS shows off the next bit of its talent, which is to deliver high levels of entertainment to its driver. It starts with a steering that is well weighted and accurate and continues with fine body control that allows you to take liberties with its cornering attitude. For a family sedan, there’s little bodyroll, and front end grip is stronger than you might imagine, which encourages you to press on, clipping apexes along the way.

Try the same with the Civic i-VTEC and the nose washes out very early on. You can actually hear and feel the tyres wilting under the pressure, which is frustrating because you need to back-off with so much performance potential left untapped. The steering fares similarly; although we have become accustomed to Honda EPS, when combined with a chassis that is much too soft for some spirited driving, it just fails to inspire confidence at the wheel.

Making matter worse is that in this type of real-world driving, the Ford also has the upper hand in acceleration as its fatter torque curve launches it out of corners with more gusto. The Civic I-VTEC is left waiting for its top-end rush to arrive, and when it does, it’s time to brake for a corner. At least this is where both cars are evenly matched – powerful stoppers – but again, the Honda loses points for too much dive when you really lean on the left pedal.

That leaves the final dynamic discipline of ride comfort. If you think the penalty for such fine handling in the Lynx RS is a harsh ride, you are wrong. Ford have managed to find a rare balance for their sports sedan. This is where comfort and cornering ability are not opposing aims. Yes, it is firmer than average family car, but it is also pliant and absorbent in a way that doesn’t irritate over long distances. The Civic on the other hand is soft throughout, and nearly wafts over rough terrain, but the drawback for this is too much float at high speeds and over undulating roads.

So far the Civic i-VTEC has been bloodied by the Lynx RS, but it scores some points when we compare interiors. While the Honda Interior is swoopy and modern, the one in the Ford is more upright and conventional, though they did try hard to jazz it up. A black-and-silver Nardi steering wheel, red-and-black seats with RS logos, and alloy pedals are perfect for such a sporting car, but they cannot match the muted good taste of the Civic Interior. Though it is more boring, the part-leather seats and steering wheel, as well as the red-ringed meter cluster and metallic inserts will probably be more appealing to those at this end of market.

VERDICT:

It is not hard to conclude from this report that if you really want a sporty C-segment sedan, there is only 1 choice. The Ford Lynx RS is one of those rare cars that not only put the fun back into driving but also don’t ask you to accept compromises in comfort and practically in return. It is perhaps the most complete car in its class and as such deserves all the plaudits it receives.

Honda’s Civic I-VTEC is a very handsome and capable car, but calling it sporty is just setting up people for a disappointing experience because it is not set up to deliver even a remotely sporting experience. It is more of a fast highway cruiser. For Civic fans, it probably represents a pinnacle in Malaysia, but don’t expect it to be much fun on a winding road. For that experience, start lobbying Honda for Type-S kit for this car. FAISAL.
 

blogger templates | Blogger