TOP 6 WORST Protons

1) Proton Tiara.

Why?
24,000 units sold from 1996 to 2000.  How many can you see on the road today?  Mostly kantoi.  Utterly unreliable and Cramped interior + useless boot.  3 wheel nuts = A JOKE!




2) Proton Juara.

Why?
Ugly as sin (Too boxy).  Underpowered 1.1 engine, Impractical fixed 4+2 seats instead of 7 seats as seen in similar sized Suzuki ERV.  Also, low rear lights (At Bumper level), what a Joke. No demand =  1 of the WORST Resale value car.



3) Proton Saga LMST.

Why?

Montage above: What I mean by Side bumpers. Saga LMST no longer have them.

Milotin car; They removed the Side bumpers (found in Iswara), Almost 0 safety features (only front seat belts that's all; Bumper drop upon collision. Dinosaur Carburetor engine. Floaty at over120km/h. An irony consider it produced from 2004 to 2008. 1.3 only as they dropped the 1.5 engine.

4) Proton Iswara LOCAL Spec Milotin/ Taxi spec.  1993-2003
Why?
Milotin.  Thinner body/steel VS UK-specs.  Rust issues (Esp 1993 to 1999), Floaty at over 120km/h.  Bumper drop upon collision = USELESS.

5) Proton Waja Campro / 1.8 Renault Engine.
Why?
Campro drinks petrol especially Automatic (RM0.27/km average), slower than 4G18.  Difficult to tune/Re-map ECU.  1.8 Renault engine = Unreliable, ultra-high maintenance, Gearbox problem.  A pity.  Otherwise very high-specced car with Excellent ride and handling.

6) Proton Wira 1.3/1.5/1.6 1994-1999. 

Why?
Chronic Rust issues.  1.3 and 1.5 3 speed Auto paired with a Heavy body = Underpowered.  1.6 Auto = Gearbox problem.  2000 onwards = better because they FIXED the Rust issues (Salty glue used for Welding).

Presenting Top 12 Best Protons

In this blog entry, I'm going to rank (in my opinion) 12 of the Best Protons ever produced. Reasons behind each ranking added.

1) Proton Saga 1.5S/1.5i/Executive 1985-1992.

Why?
Bulletproof Engine (ultra reliable) (My friend's Saga had 1st overhaul at 400,000km!) and 70% Mitsubishi parts. So many still running on the road is a testimony how tough it is. Easy to repair 3 piece Steel bumpers. EXECUTIVE model very spacious had XXL Rear legroom.  Orion (1985-87) model already a CLASSIC.

2) Proton Putra 1.8 EXI DOHC 1996-99/Wira 1.8 EXI DOHC Ltd (95-97)

Why?
High revving 4G93 engine. Earlier MMC ECU Batch better. Very stylish (for Putra), Reliable. It's placed higher than Satria GTI due to Practicality both bigger boot and rear head/legroom over Satria GTI.

3) Proton Satria GTI (1998-2000)/1st batch Satria 1.6 (1995-96).

Why?
The former's Worthy of it's GTI Batch. Great Lotus Ride and handling. 1st few batches with MMC ECU tops 210km/h and 0-100km/h in 7.8secs. Late 2000 till 2003 uses Siemens ECU = less powerful 193km/h and 9 secs for 0-100km/h. As for the Satria 1.6, 1st batch, the one with "Original MMC rear lights" (See picture below). Better built.

4) Proton Perdana SEi 1995-1997/ Perdana V6 1998-99 (1st batch).
Why?
Perdana SEi = Eterna. / 1st batch Perdana V6 = Better built quality with 70% MMC parts.

5) Proton Inspira 1.8/2.0P
Why?
Bargain Lancer EX clone (2.0) with better Ride and Handling. Value for money. Though Naza Forte 2.0SX's better equipped @ RM6k more only. Manual 1.8 = Driver's car.

6) Proton Exora

Why?
Spacious Interior (I can fit in 3rd row easily (5 feet 9, 93kg and 38" waistline)), Excellent Ride and handling. Value for money. Let down only by the Underpowered engine and plasticky dashboard.



7) Proton Waja 4G18. 2000-2003.

Why?
Earlier model has better built quality than the 1st facelift (2004). MMC ECU Highly Tunable. Excellent Lotus Ride and handling. Mechanically reliable.


8) Proton Persona (EXCLUDES GEN-2)

Why?
Inconsistent Built quality caused it to placed at #8 though it has Excellent Lotus Ride and handling and spacious interior. Reason why it excludes Gen-2's due to Gen-2 poor headroom, lack of glovebox and worse built quality.

9) Proton Satria Neo.

Why?
Lower position is due to Crampier interior than original Satria, Low front and rear headroom. NOT MEANT FOR ANYONE >183cm (6 footer). Otherwise it's Excellent Ride and Handling car.

10) Proton Saga BLM 2008 to 2010.

Why so lowly ranked?
Inconsistant built quality. Lowly specced (imagine a 2009 car still came with rear self-winding window). NO ABS, Pre-facelift better looking. Automatic drinks fuel. RM0.24/km.

11) Proton MPi/UK-spec Iswara.

Why?
This is MY 1st Car. Owned it from 2000 to 2008. 50% MMC Parts including ECI-Multi engine, Lancer Fiore Dashboard and Fuel tank/pump/cap. Reliable. Thicker body shell (heavier bonnet). Rust issue is the reason why it ranked so low.

12) Proton Savvy

Why so lowly ranked?
Questionable built quality and high maintenance costs (Renault Clio engine). Cramped interior (poor headroom and legroom front and rear and limited boot space. Otherwise Good fun to drive car with excellent ride and handling.

Wait till you see my upcoming post: TOP 6 WORST Protons.